5 Questions for a Hollywood Director:

David Tausik has worked in Hollywood for over 20 years as a director, producer and writer. He started his career working under Roger Corman. He is now preparing a feature he wrote and will be directing, to be set in Cuba.

1. You started quite young, and I am guessing that your first crews were quite young, and now some have gone on to win Oscars. How did you go about chosing the DPs you worked with?

I chose my DPs in what I imagine are the usual ways, first looking at the work of people who were available to me at my low budgets and singling out those whose look I liked for the project, then asking people who had worked with those DPs if they were fast (since our shooting schedules were very short) and worked well with others, and finally interviewing my top candidate to make sure our ideas and personalities meshed.

Because each film I directed was shot in a different part of the world and we didn’t have the money to fly in and house a DP from L.A., I had to find someone new each time. That was a drag, but the upside was that I learned something from each of the DPs I worked with.

One of the first films I worked on as a writer and 2nd unit director, back in 1990, which was directed by someone else, was an $800,000 comedy that was shot by Phedon Papamichael, Wally Pfister, and Janusz Kaminski. I think Mauro Fiore gaffed a few scenes since he was working with Janusz at the time. It’s not the fault of those incredibly talented shooters that the film doesn’t look particularly good — talent is important but you also need resources.

Janusz Kaminski shot the first film I directed, a very low-budget erotic thriller for Roger Corman. During filming he was hired to shoot Schindler’s List and so, for very good reasons, he took his name off the credits. He did a beautiful job, though, and also worked very fast which enabled us complete on our brutally short 16-day schedule. On the day Janusz had his big interview with Spielberg, Mauro Fiore, who was the gaffer, stepped in as D.P.

Talented people like that were looking for work and were available to anyone who had the ability to see how good they were. And that’s still the case.

2. What was it like working under Roger Corman, and do you see any similarities to what is happening with the DSLR revolution in Hollywood?

It was both wonderful and frustrating to work under Roger’s system in the ’90s. Wonderful because things came together fast, and there weren’t a lot of committees to meddle in your creative decisions. The place was a factory to churn out product for the video market, and if you could figure out how to keep your project contained enough to fit through their chute, you could get it done. Certainly, though, no one would lift a finger to help you make your film better — that was entirely up to you and whoever on your crew you could marshall to your cause.

Typically, people would bust their butts on their first few Corman films and then realize that their efforts were kind of wasted. People who stayed there longer than that were generally making garbage just to pick up a few bucks or because they didn’t know what else to do.

I think the DSLR revolution is an entirely different beast. Roger had a market for his films. The digital revolution means we no longer need Roger’s lumber yard full of old cameras, lights, C-stands, Moviolas, and Nagras, but we’re still desperately in need of an audience.

DSLRs are like the portable equipment that appeared in the early 60s allowing the Nouvelle Vague and the Cinema Verite movements to happen. I believe some great things will come, due to the accessibility and portability of these new instruments. They’ll come from independent, self-starting artists, and not from a factory like Corman’s.

3. When you are writing, are you also thinking about who the actors will be, and how you will direct them, or is that a separate process?

When I’m writing, I’m imagining the entire movie in my head, but I know if the film is made it won’t exactly match what I had in mind, because every collaborator will bring something different. Actors, especially, put their own stamp on scenes. I always have an idea of how I’d like a scene done, but once the actors start working that idea might fly out the window because the characters have to belong to the actors. So, in that way, yes, it’s a separate process. Of course, there’s always the opportunity to re-write scenes to fit the actors — that’s one of the advantages of writing and directing.

4. What is your method of working with editors? Are you in there every day, or do you let them do their thing for a while, and then you look at it?

I always want to hang around and edit the film with the editor. But after a while I get the hint that I’m not really needed, and I’ll usually take a break — perhaps my first break away from the film in a year’s time. It’s valuable because I can come back with slightly fresh eyes and it gives the editor a chance to find his/her own voice in the project. So, yes, I like to let the editor surprise me and I try not to micro-manage.

5. I know that sound and music are very important to you. At what point in the process do you start to bring them in? Do you have a thought on that before you start shooting?

I bring them in as early as possible, especially if they are a part of the fictional world you’re creating. Although sounds can always be substituted later, you can take something away from the authenticity of an actor’s performance that way. It’s better to do your work early, so that the cast and crew can benefit from your choices, rather than trying to slide it all it in during post.

 
#form-947
 

Our newest team member at DHS

Introducing Dan Chapman, AKA Dante. Dan is the newest member of the team here at DHS. Dan is working as a camera operator on all our motion projects, and helping out with post/media management. He comes to us from Orlando,Fl and Full Sail University. We love working with Dan, and we really love having a camera operator that we can call Dante.

 
#form-907
 

Pop Photo Interview

Here is a link to my interview in Pop Photo this month I am incredably excited to be part of this and deeply humbled that they chose me to be interviewed.

What I really hope is that from this more people will be making movies. So many people are intimidated by the process, and it really does not have to be that hard. Yes, once you get into splitting feeds, video villages, follow focus motors and the lot, it can be complex. But you can make a very nice professional quality movie with these little cameras with out all that. This is my message in the interview, just point the camera and shoot. Its not so hard. Isn’t that how we started taking photos?

There is a huge amount of information out there. For me, my day starts each and every morning with an email from Planet 5D. Mitch does a great job of searching the web for interesting developments and videos. I am happy to support them. If you are only going to look at one site, it is Planet 5D. They collect information from all over the world and post it. From there, if I see anything interesting, directors, gear, or videos, I drill down to find out more. I can honestly say, that if not for that site and for Shane’s site, I would not being doing what I do today.

Next comes my RSS feed: A Photo Editor, Canon Rumors, PDN pulse, Shane Hurlbut, ProLost, The Creators Project, Heather Morton Art buyer, Chase Jarvis, Philip Bloom, Nowness, Gizmodo, Vincent LaForet. These sites and the people who write have all been my teachers. They put their hearts into letting all of us know what they do, and I am deeply grateful to them. If there is anything that needs more investigation, I do it. The RSS list is constantly changing. I want to keep changing the people I read so that I don’t get too much of any one persons KoolAid. Because, we all have our own special KoolAid if you know what I mean.

If there is something that I want to know even more about, I send an email to the person. Almost never has someone not returned one of my questions. I love connecting to other creators. These connections are fantastic resource. I now have a pretty good network of professionals out there that I can send a question to.

I also read American Cinematographer. I highly recommend reading every word and save every issue. This is a magazine about the real giants. Even though I probably won’t have a 100 strong camera dept any time soon, it is great to read exactly how movies are made by people who are the best in the world at it. My copies look like porcupines with post-it notes sticking out all over them.

Books: In the Blink of an Eye by Walter Murch. DV Rebels Guide by Stu Maschwitz, Apple Pro Training Series on Final Cut and Color are the basics. Every book I read, I make notes in. My memory may not be so great, but I have an annotated library to back it up.

To me this is not work. In the words of my friend Jeff Hirsch at FotoCare ” It’s like springtime all over again”. I mean, how many chance in life do you get to re-invent yourself?

 
#form-856
 

Silent Movie Love affair

Today we are working on the edit of the video for The Skateboard Diaries. The process is, we take a bunch of sub clips and dump them randomly into a FC time line so that we can start to get an idea of what they will feel like. Right away I am thinking about what the sound treatment will be. We go through about 100 stock music clips, and this is always the case, I end up screaming that they are all awful. Yuk. Stock music is like stock photography, I don’t get it. Right now we have some real music tracks selected that we really like, and now I have contact the bands to make sure they are cool with us using them. Almost always this works out fine. And it is real music vs whatever that stuff called “emo tracks” etc.

But then I came across the video below by Brit photog Kalpesh Lathigra. It is silent. Wow, what a revelation. And there is a power to it, it is compelling maybe because it is silent. It is an entirely visually experience, so I don’t want to look away. It is the anti John Williams approach. Ok, John may be a great guy, but it makes me insane when I see a movie he has scored. It is like he thinks I am so dumb, I can’t get the story feeling from the movie, he has to bludgeon me with the soundtrack. Arghhhhhhh.

Which brings us to Vimeo and YouTube. I guess people put bad music on their videos because they think they have to have some music. I am just as much at fault here as anyone else. I mean, if I don’t have music, it will be boring right? But there are so many more options out there. Record street sounds, static, silence, breathing, animal sounds, whale sounds, whatever. Of course, you can always find some $1.99 stock music for your work, but try to make it better. Or try silence, that maybe fantastic, who knows. I know I have become a huge fan Kalpesh Lathigra now. Check out the surfers. Love the wave sounds, and only wave sounds.

 
#form-847
 

Image indigestion is a good thing

We create a lot of content over here at DHS. At the moment we are finishing up retouching on a complex 8 image global ad campaign. On the personal side, we are crunching through the video of The SkateBoard Diaries on one station, while the station next to it is working on the thousands of stills. Yesterday we shot all day: video and stills personal project of an artist and her process. Tomorrow we go to Oregon where I will do a motion piece staring my mom. Everyday that I am not on a commercial job, we are either shooting, planning or editing a personal project.

This leads to a couple of things. First, a small fortune in digital backups. Second, image indigestion. This is a good problem, as far as problems go. It means that we are creating content faster than we are editing/retouching/publishing. Of all the problems for someone in the image production business to have, this is a great one. There will always be downtime at some point to work through the backlog. We are on a roll right now, and having been here before, I know these things don’t go on indefinitely. When you are in the flow, dive further in. You can always take time off, but you can’t always turn the dial back up on creativity.

 
#form-811
 

My new favorite DSLR rig

If you read this blog, you know my rap is always the same. Less is better. Don’t let technology stand in your way. Here is a picture of my cameraman Dante with our new rig working yesterday on a film we are doing. This is the deal: flag pole carry belt for a huge cost of 29 buckaroos. Small consumer monopod for another 30 big ones. It works great, and he is walking in sand, which ain’t easy.

I have a whole box of RedRock tinker toys. Yes they are useful for certain things, but this rig works better than any shoulder mount, chest mount that we have ever used. Something about the way it is tied into the body makes the movement super natural. Yes all you gear babies out there, we have used it with 4 inch rails and a follow focus. Works fine.

Hey Eagle Mountain Flag, could we do this thing in another color?

  1. Rich Collins Says:

    Hi David, from your article on popphoto, this is, I thought better than me, a stranger, calling you.

    http://www.popphoto.com/video/2010/07/pro-dslr-video-tips-david-harry-stewart#comment-73601
    Submitted by Rich on Jul 17, 2010 09:41:55 am

    Q. Yeah, but there’s some stuff you can’t do without, right?
    A. You need a magnifier—it helps you see better and also helps you brace the camera. A stabilized lens helps a lot.

    Would you mind adding details? There seem to be a vast array of these from numerous manufacturers. I’ve heard that the Nikon DK-17M or 21M, the Pentax 0-ME53 and the Olympus AS-ME1 all fit, but none of these look even close to yours pictured above (i.e. in the article on popphoto). Complaints are that view is slightly darker and that readings of exposure etc are hard to see and that corners are not visible without shifting one’s eyes to see the edges. And that some retro-fitting is necessary. If yours is rather expensive would you mind suggesting one of the three I have mentioned which you know to work well or another you have tried? Thanks and btw an excellent read.

    And of course now that I’ve seen the flag-pole carry belt, hah!! I’ve ordered one, very nice idea.

  2. David Says:

    Hi Rich,
    Thanks for your question. By magnifier, I mean a loupe type device that goes over the rear LCD screen so that in Live View you can see the image more clearly. When using Live View, your normal viewfinder is not used. I use an earlier version made by Zacuto. It is excellent, however I had to glue the receiver onto the screen. The newer ones are not like this. Hoodman also makes a nice magnifier. I hope that helps.
    Best wishes,
    David

 
#form-788
 

Summer vacation?

We get a lot of email here from people who are interested in becoming professional photographers/film makers, or who just want to know how to improve their game. I always tell people the same thing: shoot your way out.

There is a story I remember hearing about Andrea Blanche, the big time 80s photographer and Avedon, whom she earlier assisted for. Sorry Andrea if I have the name wrong here, it was a long time go that I read this story. The essence of it was that she went to Avedon saying she was stuck in her professional work, and didn’t quite know what to do. He told he to get out of her studio, take a 35mm camera and some TRIX and spend the summer at Coney Island taking photographs. Essentially, get back to basics and shoot your way out of the problem. My recollection is that it worked out very well for her.

In an effort to further share what goes on here, and how we deal with the constant challange of making better and better images, here is what my summer projects look like:

-Started making a film project of the skaters down at the Venice Skate park. Slow mo with the 7D of the exhibitionist style avengers at the worlds most gorgeous skate park. Along with this I am doing stills with my H3D. Loving this project.

-Doing a series of studio portraits of young people 17-23 dealing with a moment when something unkown is about to happen.

-A short film of my artist friend Kat. Terrifically talented classical painter. Still working on getting a handle on the look for this one.

-Food. ok, this is a total disconnect, but i love eating, and have been taking snap shots of my dinner plate for years. I want to try something simple, long lens, back lit, of some of the things that i like to eat.

-Mom. Going to visit mom in a few weeks and think it would be very interestig to do something with the 5D and her in her world. She is the worlds healthiest most active senior. An absolute model for how to be happy and older.

Its a lot, but I am obsessed. NOW what are you doing this summer?
Picture 21

  1. Andy Says:

    Great advice. I’m going to start my list now.

  2. David Says:

    HI Andy,
    Thanks for writing in. Love your BW bike shots.
    David

  3. meg Says:

    on deck:

    1. possible still life project of bizarre abandoned articles at the MTA’s lost and found

    2. hilarious/raunchy shoot for new upstart mag, called KONG, started by the former editor of playgirl…it’s gonna be great!

    3. constantly documenting the changes down at coney the last five summers

    4. similar to your writing about shooting your mom, i’m going home again in july and really would like to take portraits of my folks as i’ve never been able to accurately capture them–they are the toughest subjects for me personally

    love your foray into video stuff, d! can’t wait to see the skaters.

  4. Nat Thompson Says:

    Hi , Ive just been reading on another blog about personal work today…. So this is a good question and a good article youve written . Thanks. I actually started an ideas board today in my house… so far I wanna

    do some formalish portraits of …a monk in a downtown temple, the street beggar I keep riding past who has long hair, the kids over the road who sell birds…. a time lapse of “Walking Street” a street here in Chiang Rai Thailand which gets turned into an open air market one night every week and gets crazy packed with people and last but not least a timelapse of the clock tower , this new golden roundabout clock tower that has a bizarre light show with music three times a night and people come out to watch. its freaky and cool. PS I watched the Beyonce video. Man she is a hot mamma!

    Good Luck with summer. We are going into rainy season….
    Nat

  5. David Says:

    Hi Nat,
    Thanks for writing in.Great ideas all of them.
    How are things in Thailand these days? Are you working there?
    David

  6. Nat Thompson Says:

    Hi , So many ideas and its so freakin hot! I sweated an ocean yesterday cruising around the city taking photos.

    Things in the North are fairly stable. There is alot of Thaksin support ( former prime minister and unofficial leader of ‘the red shirts’) in the North because he gave ship loads of money to poor people when he was in office. Money he got from being the most sly and genius ‘business man’ in Thailand. However… people here are just so cruisey. Thai people in general dont like aggression. We had a little protest and one bomb in an ATM in this city. Thats all :) Bangkok seems to be clearing up. It really hurt tourism obviously.

    Im here on a self funded year of shooting for an organisation who work with ethnic minorities in the mountains. The people groups are more well known as “Hilltribes”. Im just wanting to help any organisations here who are doing good stuff really. I dont know why Im here. I just want to learn, get better at shooting and um do something with my life :)

    Yesterday I did this challenge that Scott Kelby laid down about taping up your LCD and shooting only one “roll of film” digitally. It was good. made me realise how fast I shoot and how much I need to slow down and think more.

    Since I have uber time on my hands now (no friends and no tv ) its awesome to read what other photographers have to offer.
    Regards
    Nat

  7. admin Says:

    HI Nat,
    Sounds great. A wonderful opportunity t do some good work.
    Love the idea of taping over the LCD.
    Best
    David

 
#form-611
 

Beyonce has a wicked good time.

Having had 2 cups of coffee this morning, I have decided that the new Beyonce video is genius. Actually, we here at the studio have been mezmerized by a whole series of music videos on line. (Who says that the music videos don’t matter anymore?). The Beck/Charllotte Gainsbourg “Heaven Can wait”, the much hyped MIA video by the current bad boy of video Romain Gravis, anything from the new creative director of Polaroid Special Products Ms Gaga, and our new favorite: Beyonce’s Why Don’t You Love Me. I can’t get over how much fun this is to watch, and am thinking how much fun they must have had making it. Know what I mean?

 
#form-604
 

Audio: How to of the Asia Mon Amour soundtrack

http://www.vimeo.com/11366202
  1. lee Says:

    really interesting, adds a lot to the video.

  2. David Says:

    Hi Lee, thanks for your comment and support. I am glad you got something useful out of it. The best thing some one told me was ” Video pushes and Audio pulls”. That line keeps rattling in my head. Anything we can do to make our work better is a good thing.
    David

 
#form-534
 

Friends of ASC membership

For everyone who has been following this blog, I want to thank you for your support. I hope I have been helpful to you. Here is something really special, something that if you are a photographer, film maker, or want to be one, is just too good to be true.

The American Society of Cinematographers is offering a Friends of ASC membership for $100. I get no benefit from this, I am letting everyone know because I think this is by far and way the deal of the century for people who are interested in learning about cinematography. Truthfully, I debated with myself if I should keep this one to myself, it is that good of a find. The bennies are unreal, like you have direct email access to the ASC members to ask them lighting questions. How great is that? There are also online videos about lighting, discounts on gear. I sort of can’t believe what they are doing here. This is the real deal, with the people who are the best in the world at what they do, offering to show us exactly what they do. Isn’t that something you would want to know? There is plenty of info and instructionals out there from novice HDSLR film makers, like me, but wouldn’t it be great to hear from the titans of the film world about how they do their thing?

Enjoy and learn. Share the love.Picture 1

 
#form-496
 

SHOOT VIDEO NOW! YOU CAN DO THIS!

I just posted the Asia Mon Amour Video, which has been getting a lot of attention. Here is exactly what you need to know so you can make your own video:

Here is what I used: Canon 5DII for the normal speed work done at 30p. Canon 7D for the slow mo shot at 60p. I had 4 x 16 gigs UDMA CF cards. A single Zacuto Z finder with a mount on each body. Lenses: 24-70 Canon, 35 1.4 Canon, 50 1.2 Nikon with Fotodiosc adapter, 85 1.2. , Zeiss 21 2.8. I brought other glass, but that is what I used. There was an H4N Zoom recorder used to for drum track recorded live in Bali. I had 2,3,4 stop B+W ND filters, and a SingRay filter (which I will never use again). The only rig I used was for the Tokyo subway and the Monkey Forrest a Fig Rig. Otherwise all hand held.

YOU CAN DO THIS!

The kids in the park clips were done with a with a 7D and the Zeiss 2.8 shot at 5.6 and 1/125 with me litterally holding the camera in the palm of my hand at knee level and chasing those kids. How is that for simple? Got no Zeiss? A Canon zoom would work fine.

YOU SHOULD BE DOING THIS!

There is so much racket out there about all the gear and all the crap we are suppose to need in order to make motion pieces, and I temporarily drank that Kool Aid, but now I am off. Keep it super simple. You will be happier. You will do more videos.

This is the super simple scoop on what to do:

1. Set picture style to Neutral, then Sharpen to 0, Sat -1, Contrast -1, Color tone 0
2. Use only these ASAs: 160,320, 640, 800, 1250
3. If you are using 24p, set the shutter at 50, if you are using 30p set the shutter at 50, If you are using 60p then Shutter at 125. ( unless you are shooting night in a country with 50HZ electric, like Europe, then alway shutter at 50 or 100)
4. The color in the LCD is the color you are going to have to live with. Set the Color Temp to something you like.
5. Point camera, turn on Live View, focus using the 5x and 10x magnifier button
6. For day light, try to keep the lens at 5.6, too high and it gets videoee and too low and it is tough to hold focus. Use the NDs. Night time is easy, because you don’t need any ND.
7. Steady yourself, and Record clip.

YOU JUST MADE A MOVIE! FANTASTIC!

OK, so there is a lot more to learn than this, that whole Final Cut bear, but these are the basics to get you going. You can do something really great with just this. You really can. Questions? I’ll answer everything I can, and if I don’t know the answers, I probably know someone who does.

DON’T DFELAY, MAKE A MOVIE TODAY!

  1. Michael Sugrue Says:

    Very well put, and the video’s beautiful. Drop the gear pretensions and start shooting! Although I think it’s more different from photography than still life is from portraiture. If you have any interest and/or aptitude for it, there’s no longer an excuse not to be shooting.

  2. DHS Says:

    HI Michael, Thanks for your comments and your support. So many of my pro photography friends are scared off by all the tech talk. It doesn’t have to be that way. It can be very very simple.

  3. Chris Robertson Says:

    Why have you chosen to use those ASAs? Is there something different then say 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600?

    Just came across your blog by following a trail from your May 2010 appearance in PDN. Love your writings. Inspiring and insightful.

    Thanks!

  4. David Says:

    Hi Chris,
    Thanks for your kind words about the blog and for taking the time to track it down. There are specific ASAs in the Canons that seem to be native, whereas the others are interpolated. So if you shoot a clip at say 200, it won’t look as good as something shot at 320. Weird, I know. I would like to take credit for discovering this, but it was Shane Hurlbut who went to the trouble of running the tests. My use of the camera has confirmed what Shane found. But check it out for yourself, I think you will be surprised.
    Best wishes,
    David

  5. Chris Robertson Says:

    I’ve actually heard something similar but I had heard that it worked best at numbers like 200, 400, 800… Thanks for the name! I’m going to look into it.

  6. david Says:

    Hi Chris,
    Thanks for your comment. The ones that seemed to work are best are the ones listed. Try a test yourself, I would be curious if you came up with different ASAs.
    Best wishes,
    David

 
#form-492
 

Asia Mon Amour

  1. Chris Beckman Says:

    Awesome Video really makes me want to go there. Loved the camera angles

  2. DHS Says:

    Thanks Chris! I appreciate your support. Asia is an amazing place. Bangkok makes the US seem so last century.

  3. Mike Henry Photo Says:

    Beautiful video…really captures that culture and reminds me of a month I spent in Vietnam. I just started shooting a bit of video and this really inspires me to go out and shoot more. Thx

  4. David Says:

    Hi Mike,
    Thanks for your gracious support. Go shoot more! Most definitely. It doesn’t cost anything, and who knows where it will lead you. Your little 10 sec video is great. Love it!
    David

  5. Aaron Says:

    Great video. Wouldn’t be surprised if Hollywood comes knocking asking you to direct some commercials or films after this one. It was shot and edited well, and it’s clear you have a great vision for things.

    I looked over the list of equipment you used to record this. While your video was definitely worth the work, I find it so hard to do both. To go from the single-frame mind to the video-frame mind takes some practice. But you have proven that a person with a good vision can make anything look beautiful with any camera in his/her hand.

    Keep up the great work,
    Aaron

  6. David Says:

    Hi Aaron,
    Thanks for your kind words. I really appreciate the time you took to comment.
    The points you bring up are so true. As a disclaimer, when I was shooting video, I was not shooting stills. At the moment, that is hard for me to do both. It is a completely, almost opposite way of seeing. So I tend to do one or the other. On the skate project I am doing, I shoot the stills, while I direct a couple of guys who are doing the motion. There are draw backs to that too, but that seems to be the way to go on that project. I have heard that some people can flip from one to the other, maybe you and I will both get to that point. Who knows. The editiing that you commented on was done in “collaboration” with my brilliant editor Magdalena. Basically, she would do a rough edit and I would comment. Editing is more than a skill, it is a god given talent. I know FC, and can work a time line just fine, but I don’t have the organizational mind that is needed to pull something of like Asia. She had over 2500 clips to organize. There is no way that piece would have looked anywhere near that good if not for her input.
    Good luck with you motion adventures. I look forward to seeing what you come up with.
    Best wishes,
    David

  7. Dan Says:

    Hi David, Really nice piece. It appeals to me on both an artistic front and as a travelogue. I have all sorts of questions for you but will try to limit them to a few, if you have time to reply.
    1. Are you using 30p on the 5D (vs 24p) for a specific reason? Is it to “match” better with the converted 60p footage?
    2. You did some very fast focus work, like the shot of the fast moving boat. Any tricks, other than using the Z-finder?
    3. I was impressed at how you were able to put the locals at ease with having a camera pointed at their face. I find that often folks on the street get upset when do it. Do you talk to them first? Any specific tactics you can share?
    4. I love your music selections. Were these all selections you already were familiar with, or have you found a good way to sample and find new music for your project?

    Once again, beautiful video. Hope you do a behind-the-scenes video someday to tell us all how you did it.
    Dan

  8. David Says:

    HI Dan,

    Thanks for your excellent questions. This video was shot end of December beginning of January, and as I recall the 24P update was not available then. Now I shoot mostly at 24p on the 5D.. Sometimes I will shoot the 5D at 30p, and then conform it to 24p for a slight slo mo effect. The 60p on the 7D is always brought down. I find 60p on the 7D to be very video-ey, unless converted to 30 or 24p.

    Actually, there is very little focus tracking, if any. The trick is to keep the subject more or less the same distance. In the case of the boat, it was shot at about f8 on something about a 35mm lens, so lots of DOF.

    The street people shooting is something that I have to feel out each and every time. Sometimes I will hire a local “fixer”. Someone who speaks the language, and can help fascilitate a shoot. This was the case in Bali. We hired a taxi driver/guide to take us around. We happened upon a group of great looking people whom I paid $10 for their attention for about a 1/2 hour. Sometimes though, a good smile and a slightly nutty look will do the trick. We photographers often have to be entertainers.

    The music and sound mix took a long time to figure out. I had no idea what it was going to be until we started editing the footage. I have a blog post that goes into exactly how the sound time line was done: Audio: How to of the Asia Mon Amour soundtrack. The finding of music is a huge job and I wish I could give you some short cuts, but I don’t know any, other than to hunt.

    I hope this is helpful

    Best wishes, and thank you for your support

    David

 
#form-483
 

Want to be a better photographer? Shoot motion.

One of the great surprises to me in my exploration of working with motion is that is has been so helpful for my stills work. Shooting motion is an entirely different skill set than doing stills. There is the way the camera moves, there is sound, there is editing, and there is an awful lot of technology. Many things to think about. Thinking is good. With an automatic camera or a good assistant one can do stills on auto pilot and bring back something decent. But not with motion. You must constantly be aware of all these other elements or you will end up with a mess. Video will wake you up to a new way of thinking and seeing. Yes it is hard, and yes it takes forever to complete a project, but is all great for you to do. It’s wonderful to learn these new ways of seeing and producing imagery. I promise you, it will inform your stills work and after 6 weeks of post production on a tiny motion project, make your stills work a joy to do.

A central thing about video and film is that is story driven, in a way that some photography does not need to be. Making a motion piece will focus you on the idea of story. One can shoot still pictures of all manner of things and have them be somewhat interesting, but if you want to be a successful photographer you must learn to tell a story. This is a simple fact, we are storytellers, not just image makers. If you are doing want to do advertising, weddings, news, or any other form of photography, you are a storyteller. In motion you are constantly thinking about the entirety of the piece and about how that will get the story told, other wise you have a lovely piece of abstract art piece. Motion will make you a better storyteller, and that will make you a better photographer.

I know this from my own experience. The making of motion projects is a huge drain on the resources of my studio, and I often ask myself why am I doing this. I do it because I can, and I enjoy it. As a side benefit, I can see the difference in the quality of the stills work I have done in the last couple of months, and I am convinced this is because of the efforts I have made in motion work. Thank you for your attention and if you have any thoughts on this I would love for your to share them.

  1. Michael Sugrue Says:

    I agree 100%. I got into motion about a year and a half ago, and all of the elements involved are just more ways to stimulate your creativity. It’s definitely not for everyone, but I’ve found it to be an incredible outlet.

 
#form-435
 

NYTIMES.COM Today

This just blew my mind this morning. You have got to see this. The front page opens and the banner for The Fugitve starts to move, there is a Wompf noise when the helo comes into frame, even if the ad sound is off. Then the action slides down into a fake insurance company ad underneath. Clicking on the ad will take you into the Fugitive web site. Mind blowing usage of motion on a still page. This is what the iPad is about. This is why it is such an amazing device. Yes I know about the Flash issue, but I predict in 6 months it will be a non-issue. Picture 14

 
#form-427
 

The Tipping Point

I have read on 2 seperate site this week that Canon is rumoured to be making the 1DSIV with Raw video. Wow! That would seal the deal for Canon as the premier small camera platform. The biggest problem I have with the 5D is the h.264 compression. We all deal with it, but to have RAW, would be awesome, well not so awesome if you are the RED ONE company. Add to this that Zeiss anounced that will be releasing a set of cinema primes for for EOS/PL mounts, and you have a huge step forward in HDSLR film making. The speed at which these developments are arriving is stunning. It feels like something has tipped, as Malcom Gladwell would say.

The next thing I would love to see would be Canon releasing cinema lenses for their own cameras. They have the best technology out there, they just need to apply it. That Zeiss, with 20 year old technology can steal the show from them is a bit amusing. But, it is just a matter of time. Canon has fantastic IS, they have great autofocus, they make wonderful cinema lenses for super 16 ( The Hurt Locker was shot with them), they just need to make put all the pieces together and release some killer glass.
Picture 9

 
#form-349
 

Fresco Painting/Walter Murch/The 5Dll

There is a wonderful part in Walter Murch’s book In the Blink of an Eye (written 1999), where he is discussing the future of cinema. He makes the prescent comparison of between change from fresco painting to oil painting to the then current state of cinema and what he was foreseeing as the future of cinema. Fresco painting was a very complex difficult time sensitive process that required a large highly skilled team to mix and prep the work while the artist had a very small window of time each day to apply the material. Only a limited amount could be done in any given day, or the plaster would crack. Before begining a project they would make a map, a plan for how they were going to proceed in the coming months to complete the work. This all changed with the advent of oil paint. Now one person could complete an entire work by themselves and they could proceed through the process in a much more spontaneous manner. This resulted in what we think of as painting today. An artist with a single vision sits in front of a canvas and makes a painting. Of course, there are plenty of painting assistants in the world, and the process of making paintings is just as ikely to be done by a directed team as by an individual. But the point is, if Murakami or Koons wanted to make those paintings by hand, by themselves, they could.

Which brings me to the 5D and what is happening in the world of the moving image today. There have been many times in my career when it has been suggested to me to make a film reel. I never was that interested because of what I saw was the complexity and logistics involved in the moving image making process. Too much stuff, too many people, too much time. It seemed like a constarint on my freedom, when in stills, I could just go out by myself and make pictures any time I felt like it. Which is exactly where we are with the 5D. I quite literally use the camera every day to make motion images, and often all by myself. I have some FC skills, so I can now edit and color correct the footage. Whenever I feel like it, I can post a film on the web. This is just fantastic, really amazing. I hear Shane Hurlbut is reducing his camera dept from 150 on Terminator, down to 5, that is incredable. When anyone who has the enthusiasm to study the workings of the camera for a short period of time can make a full res Hollywood 60ft screen quality film for basically no money, that is just mind boggling. I am old enough that to me this is extraordinary, but to someone who is 17 and just starting art school, this will be the only world they have known. I am so excited about where this is all going. I am also in awe of Walter Murch’s fortune telling abilities.

 
#form-339
 

Steadycam Merlin with Canon 5Dll or 7D

After a few unsuccessful tries at getting my Merlin/7D/Zeiss 12 combo balanced, I went out to visit the. experts at Steadycam USA in Glendale. Incredibly helpful nice folks out there. Dan spent an hour and a half with me. He balanced the rig in 5 minutes, then gave me a tutorial on how to move it. We spent the last half hour with me in vest/arm setup on a SteadyCam pilot. Great fun.

So this is the deal. It is far far easier than I had imagined. Forget about all the tables and measurements you find on the web which are like 10th grade physics class all over again. No need for that stuff. Get a light stand or a tripod out and mount an arm on it with an up facing stud. If you don’t have such a thing, Steadycam will sell you one for $45. I bought one. On your finger on a desk top, try to guess the approximate center of balance for the width and length of the camera. It will probably be just back of the lens, and towards the handle. Now take the mounting plate and line up the H hole over that point. Screw in the plate to the camera so that it more or less keeps that position. On mine it was either the M or N hole. It is helpful to put some gaff tape on the plate to give it some friction against the camera bottom. Weight the spare: middle position 1 finish, one standard; bottom position start weight, finish weight and 3 middle weights. Now put the plate on the Merlin and move it back and forth until it is in very rough balance. Don’t worry if it flops around, just put it somewhere that is about right. For me, it was back about to the -2 mark. Put the camera on the stand. Move the screws side to side and back and forth until you get close to static balance. Take the Merlin off the the stand and hold the handle at a 45 degree angle. Do a drop test. You want about 1 sec of drop time from side to bottom, but this is just a guide. The drop time will effect the technics you use to guide the camera in its moves, as you will see. The drop time is adjusted by moving the spare longer or shorter. The drop time adjustment has most likely messed up the static balance, so go back and redo the static balance. Then do another drop test, and back and forth until there is static balance and about 1 second of drop time. This sounds hard, I know, but it isn’t. I can do a new lens in about 5 minutes now after having about an hour of practice.

Now this is the tricky part, actually using the Merlin. One hand holds the handle, the other hand gently pinches the control tab. What worked best for me was to tap tap tap squeeze it gently to control the motion when in a dynamic move. The hard part I found is that the my right arm gets tired, which for some reason makes my left hand squeeze more on the tab. This is where the Pilot, with its vest and arm is great. I found after 10 minutes on it I was able to do a decent job. The weight is fully taken by the vest/arm rig so there was not the brain confusion of trying to support with one hand and control with the other. Maybe it was just me, I don’t know. The other down side is the monitor screen on the Canons is hard to see if I move my arm to the side or down low. I am looking into a very light weight monitor, but have not found one yet.

All in all, the Merlin is sort of great. It is not something I am going to use all the time, but for what it does, for the its relatively light weight and lack of bulk, it is a pretty great thing. Let me know if anyone has any questions, I would be glad to share what I learned.

 
#form-335
 

“Working” 2AM Newton Market Singapore

IMG_3203

Absolutely the best chicken satay in the eastern hemisphere. And the locals loved the RedRock rig.

 
#form-328
 

ND filters

Before this current trip to Asia, I tested a number of ND filters with my Minolta Color Meter. I have 2,3,6,10 stop glass multi coated B+W neutral density filters in 58 and 78 mm sizes. I have step up/ down rings to 72, 67 and 55mm, which covers most of my lenses. For my beloved Zeiss 21 2.8, which is a 82mm front, I have a Hoya 3 stop ND and a Vari ND filter. My tests show that there is essentially no color shift with the B+W multicoated glass. I tested each of the BW filters, and the max color deflection was 100k, with most of them having no deflection at all. The Hoya was 400k and +2 green. The Fader ND was a shocking 1000k and +5 green. My 77mm SingRay showed 500k and +2 green. Bob at Singray explained that the 500k shift was intentional to offset the inherent blue cast in polarizers, which is something I had not heard of before.

The meter I use when shooting motion is the color meter, not an exposure meter. I check the exposure in the viewfinder, and only if I am unsure, do we pull out the light meter. The color however gets checked for each and every shot. I have found that color correction with h.264 is not something that is forgiving. We try as best we can to nail the look in camera. When I use the Singray, I have to compensate for the color shift by reading 500k up from where I want to be which adds an unnecessary layer of confusion that I would rather not have.

When shooting the Vari ND vs no filter, the color shift is strongly apparent. Ugly. The SingRay is not as bad, but the shift is still apparent. This says nothing of the flare that I get when shooting backlit, which completely obviates the Zeiss ability to hold shadow detail. Practically speaking, I find myself using the Singray on my 24-70 zoom only when I am in a situation of fast changing light conditions. After all, a yellowish green cast is better than not getting any shot at all. But, this is only when I have to work very fast, like today hand held on the back of a motorcycle racing down rice paddies. I think out of all the shots we did in 3 weeks, the SingRay was used maybe twice.

  1. Adam Reign Says:

    Hi David,

    Just by reading your blog I feel more confident as a photographer.

    So I only felt right sharing as well; as ND color shift issues also effected my work. What I found out was similar to the RED, the 5D needs extra IR pollution filtration when using any ND, via a “Hot Mirror” filter as the first thing the light hits. When you ND (with a filter that is only blocking visible) it increases the (relative) IR levels that your sensor is taking in. Hence the massive color shifts.

    Filmtools.com has an awesome (slightly expensive) line of IRND filters from Tiffen that combine the Hot Mirror and ND into one piece of white water glass. Which is the ultimate solution (at least in my opinion :)

    Thanks for sharing! Also anytime you need an experienced solid assistant / bts shooter (still or motion film) in Miami look no further. Would you like me to send you my resume?

    Best,

    Adam Reign
    Miami, FL

  2. admin Says:

    Thank you for your kind words. Yes the IR is an additional problem, one that I have seen show up after 6 ND. The tests I did that were showing color shift were done on a color meter and the shift was actually the other way, towards green. A better way to do the test would have been directly onto a CMOS sensor. This was done very well by Shane Hurlbut, ASC and posted on his blog. I highly recommend reading Shane, super knowledgeable and a really nice guy. Good luck and thanks again for taking the time to write in. Please send your resume to david@dhstewart.com. I was just in Miami 2 weeks ago for an ad job and could have used you.

 
#form-297
 

Jumpy Footage, Skipping frames

I have been having skippy jumpy footage issues with both my 5D and 7D. All the footage from Asia has skips in it. I can’t tell you how much angst this has caused. When I was opening the h264 files in Quicktime, they skipped, sometimes very badly. Converting to ProRes in StreamClip or Compresor and opening in Final Cut got the same results. I tried different card readers, a USB reader, different cards, different hard drives, everything short of an exorsism. I uploaded the h264 captures into Smug Mug and they were better, but there was still skipping, now in random places. I checked all 3 of my Macs, the skipping varied, but it was always there to some extent. No one had an idea what was going on, not Canon, not Apple, and I could find nothing on this on the web. Then on call number 3 to Apple, I was lucky enough to get a great tech support guy on the Final Cut line. The deal is that there is something slightly off in the CODEC of the files straight out of the camera. Why, I have no idea, especially since it is happening in every possible configuration. The solution is to open a new project in Final Cut. Open a new bin and place the clips into it. Then batch export the clips to a new folder on the hard drive. Close that project, open another new project and import the converted clips. I used ProRes 422 1920×1080 30p. They play just fine now. If anyone has any idea why this is happening out of the camera I would very much appreciate knowing.

  1. Larry C Says:

    Oh geez, I feel for you David. I was wondering why you hadn’t blogged lately! I know, it’s too much to expect video to be like using a toaster, but these kinds of things only work out well for the hair dye manufacturers… Glad you were able to resolve the issue.

  2. David Says:

    Thanks. It is sort of crazy the h264 corruption. No one has any idea what is going on. I am now in touch with the wizards at Canon, who should be in touch next week. The main thing is, except for the pain in the butt FC transcoding time, all the images are fine. In FC, the transcoding doesn’t work in the background, like StreamClip or Compressor.

  3. David Says:

    I don’t know. I am having it even playing back in the camera. Now why would it be able to record at that speed but not playback – at the same damn spot every time? I bought this paper weight 3 weeks ago and realize that all the video I was passing to my editor was crap? I am….

  4. admin Says:

    The work around I describe seems to do the trick, but I would rather be using StreamClip, much faster workflow. I am going to do some tests on a couple of other 5Ds tomorrow, and depending on the results, I am planning on sending the 5D and a card of files to CPS to see if there is a problem. My experience with the 5Dll, is that it is sort of great, but it really requires some work to get it to behave properly. I hope you stay with it, for me the hassels have been worth it.

 
#form-323
 

Winner of the Living Art contest!

I just learned that MOVING PHOTOGRAPH was the winner of the Living Art contest. A huge thanks to Alexx Henry, first for having the generosity to a hold a contest, and then for picking me. I am honored. Hearing Alexx and the other speakers at the Collision Conference changed the direction of my career. I can not express how lucky I was to be there. There is no way I would be working in motion today if not for having attended. By him having the contest, it really put a fire under me to make something special, and to get it out the door quickly. Thank you thank you thank you Alexx.

“David’s entry offered something unique that we wouldn’t get as a still or as traditional video. As a living portrait, it manages to elicit a reaction that evolves with the progression of the piece. Good stuff, David.”

 
#form-289
 

Rescued Fighting Dogs, Time Magazine

The edit was done in Final Cut. By stacking the clips in the time line one on top of each other, and then using the Motion tab-Crop and animating it with key frames, I was able to get more than one dog in the frame. The time line ended up looking like a huge V, all right crops going down, then back up with all left crops. We did a bit of speed changing using Modify-Speed change, but not that much. Each clip had to be graded separately in Colorista for intensity and contrast, however we left the color alone. There are 3 sound tracks, the speaker, a close up of a dog panting, and then a track of the overall kennel noise. I would enjoy any comments or questions anyone may have.

 
#form-271
 

Moving Photographs, on Location, Time Magazine

photo

This is my assistant Robert with the doorway dolly getting the timing of the move dialed in. I can’t reveal yet what we were shooting, as it has yet to be posted and published by the magazine, however I can tell you this was one of the most personally moving stories I have ever done- but more on that when I can show you the results.

The lens is a 70-200 f4IS lens, set at f8-f16, depending on the color of the subject. I like that lens quite a bit. Sharp, fast focusing in autofocus mode, clearly not the case here, and light weight. We initially had a 2 stop ND on the lens, but decided we wanted the depth of field. The lights, which are out of frame are 1k, 650k and 150k tungsten frensels. There is a bit of fill coming from the light panel mounted on camera. Once we got going, we took the Marshal off the camera cheese plate and mounted it to the dolly. We found that balanced the camera better on the fluid head. One of the very tricky things on this set up, is that because we had very little room to work in, the camera is as close to the back wall as possible. Thus, all the focusing and framing are done in the Marshal, but the camera moves get reversed, which is a bit weird. I had wanted to do a pan plus a dolly move, but there no way I was going to attempt that from a reversed monitor.

When we were actually shooting, I walked with the dolly facing the subject and glanced at the monitor to check composition. We tried having me sit on the dolly and view the monitor, but we found that because I am pretty animated when working, the dolly shook, and thus the image was not stable.

We chose the doorway dolly, rather than lay track purely as a time savings. The floor was reasonably flat, of course the one dip was right in the middle of the dolly move, but rather than deal with track and all that ensues, we went with the simpler method. My feeling was that if I only had 6 hours to get footage, I would rather be spending it on running the camera than messing with dolly track. Whatever bump we hit seems to have been handled by the IS lens.

The subjects we were shooting were a bit twitchy, yea just a bit, so that focusing on the eyes became a real challange. We did some with the focus enhancement in the Marshal, but decided the safest way was with the 5x magnifier in the 5DII.

shutter 1/60
white balance 3300 as read from a hand held color meter
asa 650

Keep checking the blog, I should be able to post footage next week. If anyone has any questions please let me know, I would be happy to share.

  1. Javier Says:

    “f8-f16, depending on the *COLOR*? Would you mind elaborating on this a bit, I’ve never heard of such a thing. Thanks!

  2. David Says:

    Hi Javier,
    Thanks for your question. I can see how my description would cause some curiosity. By color, I mean tone of the dogs fur. The dogs fur ranged from full white to matt black. We found that in order to hold detail on either end of the scale, we would open up for the black dogs and close down for the white dogs. The mixed ones were sort of in the middle. Once we put a dog on the platform, then we would focus and check the exposure in the Marshall. We didn’t use false color on this on, we found it misleading with the extremes of white/black fur difference, but rather went by eye.
    I hope that helps to clarify.
    Best wishes,
    David

 
#form-128
 

Moving Photograph

The idea here was sort of a play on words, how moving can I make a photograph? I hired an actress who could cry on command, which is a talent that absolutely mystifies me. I wanted her to go through a range of emotion from happy to sad, but for reasons that became clear once we started shooting, it is impossible to go quickly from happy to sad, but rather easy to go from sad to happy. I guess if one is a complete sociopath ……. but then that would also be problematic. So I let her get into severe sadness, which took her about 2 minutes, then had her go to happy. We reversed the direction in Final Cut, which if you look at the blinks, you will notice that something is up. I rather like it, an extra added unsettling bit. The shot was done with a 90TS with the focus on the eyes. My experience is that in motion work, many lenses work great that I would never dream of using in stills work for seeming to gimmicky. The entire shooting process lasted about 2 hours, and about 15 takes, after which everyone on set was exhausted. It is really quite powerful to cause then witness up close emotions like this.

The light is a 4 tube dim-able Kino to the right and a dimmed Starlight to the left. The lights in the background are the kitchen fluorescence. ASA 640, 60sec, f 4, 5000k.

Gear:
Canon 5D II set at ASA 600
90 mm ST lens
3 stop BW ND filter
Manfrotto 3051 tripod w/503 fluid head
Kino Flo 4 bulb w/gel
Marshall V-LCD-70P-HDMI monitor hot shoe mounted
StarLites 1000w on dimmers
Mac G5
Glyph Raid
Final Cut Studio
Compressor
Sorrenson Squeeze

 
#form-27
 

Gear crush of the week. 6800f/ps

Check this out. I have no idea what sort of camera shoots at that frame rate, but I would love to find out. Like did these guys get a loaner from NASA?

 
#form-151
 

Video crush of the week

Thanks to my buddy Joshua Davis, for send me this.
http://www.vimeo.com/7199178

 
#form-116
 

Glass Works

When shooting stills, at least in the current RAW world, the optical nature of the lens is not as critical as it once was. Back in the day of color trans film, back when one needed to really know how to work a light meter and a color meter, we used to pull 3 lenses of the same make and focal length and then test them for the best lens. Guess what, there was considerable variance. Pretty much everyone I knew then did the same, only the dumb dumbs were not testing before buying. That was before Photoshop and RAW, when lenses became a comodity. Thank god too, all those sleepless nights of waiting to see the clips from the lab and then hoping that the processing run was correctly judged, screw that. Gimme the RAW and let me sleep at night.

But now we have motion, which in terms of accuracy of exposure, color rendition and sharpness, it is rather similar to the old days of tranny film. Glass rules again. I saw Shane Halburt project 5DII footage on a 60ft screen that looked amazing, but it had PV glass on it. A whole other world. Those Canon lenses were never intended for this use. They are soft, flat although the colors really pop, and were designed to have the images imported into CS and massaged there. With stills, I want maximum information, which means a low contrast image. For motion, I want snap and detail, unless of course I don’t, then I want a choice.

For some excellent discussion of this, I recommend Shane’s blog. Also, Philip Bloom has some good information. But the mac daddy of lens reviews is Diglloyd. Yes, I paid up the $50, yes I am a nerd. If you really want to learn about lens bokeh ( that is the out of focus pattern of circles on a wide open lens) and other trivia, pay the man and learn. I found it fascinating. Excellent comparisons of the Zeiss, Canon and Nikon lenses for DSLRs. Fantastic pictorial examples and tons of data.

 
#form-113
 

Marshall Monitor

Here are a coupe of ways we use the Marshall. Sometimes I mount on the camera, in this case Robert clamped it onto the slider mount and I am using it to judge the speed of the tracking motion. I often use a Zacuto finder, but find with these sort of situations the Marshall works better for view while shooting. In the other image it is mounted next to the camera so that I can direct and also look at the image crop. Note the color strip on the side of then monitor. The Marshall does this really excellent false color exposure thing that is fantastic for judging exposure. It will also do a sharp line focus add screen, however I find that focus is better achieved with a Zacuto and 5x or 10x on the camera. If we are in studio, we always then take some footage, transcode to ProRes, and open up it up FC on the nice calibrated Eizo to see exactly what it looks like.

 
#form-76
 

Z-Finder

This little device is what has made using the 5DII as a movie camera possible for me. How Vince and the other pioneers were working without it astonishes me. Not only is the 3X magnifier a juicy view of the LCD, but it also helps me stabalize the camera by having a solid point of contact to my eye. Mostly, the camera just feels friendly, it feels like an extension of me when with the Zacuto. Love it. Even when I have a Marshal connected, the Zacuto is always on the back. Not to diss the competition to the Zacuto, but there is no comparison. That other device has now been turned into a very nice loupe for the Hassy HD3 screen.

Now this word of caution which should be filed under stupid human tricks. If you happen to be outside, and it happens to be sunny, and you additionally happen to have your back to the sun and the camera casually held at you side with the lens forward, you will burn holes in the LCD by magnifying the sun onto it. I know that sounds nuts, but I just came back from a job in Boise ID, where I let the client play with my baby and that is just what happened. I have 5 white burn marks on the LCD. The good thing is the fix is not heinously expensive. CPS will do it for about $200 and it takes them 3 days. Those guys rock. And my clients bill just went up by $200. I called Zacuto, who had never heard of such a nuttiness as someone actually having thier magnifier turned into a 6th grade science experiment on an unlucky and expensinve camera, but they generously are sending me a new plastic attachment square to go on the back after the CPS guys replace the LCD.

 
#form-9
 

Fotocare

Picture 4I have found that I need a partner on the equipment side who really knows what they are doing, a guy to equipment problem solve for me. For me that person is Jeff at Fotocare. Even though I am in LA most of the time these days, I would rather call Jeff in NYC, go over whatever my equipment issue de jour is and have him UPS the gear to me than deal with a local person. Not too say that there is a not a super cracker jack local gear supplier who could take care of me, I just like Jeff, I trust him, and so I deal with things long distance. For instance, I was having trouble figuring out the best way to mount my Marshal monitor. Jeff made several suggestions, sent them to me, I tried them out, and sent him back the ones I didn’t like. Jeff and I speak sometimes every day, because in this new world of moving image there is always something to figure out. And let’s face it, we are all working in a technology driven industry now. Its not like Canon vs Nikon, its much more than that silly discussion of years ago. Now I need all manner of widgets in order to make the process work, and if I don’t have all my ducks in a row, the system don’t work. Example, ND filters. Jeff was able to hook me up with BW 77 mm filters of 2,3,6 and 10 stops. That took some research on his part to dig them up, not much use for a 10 stop 77 mm ND in stills world, but with a 85 1.2 lens in daylight shooting motion, there sure is.
My plug is this, find a guy who knows his business and work with him. It will do you a world of good to have someone on the other end of the phone who you can really talk to. Let the amateur market deal with the online discount stores. I am a pro, my livelihood is at stake here, and I want somebody in the fight with me that I can count on.

 
#form-35